<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google and No-follow Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seothegame.com/google-and-no-follow-links-2052/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seothegame.com/google-and-no-follow-links-2052</link>
	<description>Where SEO Tips becomes Rocket Science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:30:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cutts Responds to Nofollow Links</title>
		<link>http://www.seothegame.com/google-and-no-follow-links-2052/comment-page-1#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cutts Responds to Nofollow Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seothegame.com/?p=2052#comment-187</guid>
		<description>[...]   Following on from the revelations that nofollow will  no longer work for sculpting PageRank, there is a post on Matt Cutts&#8217; blog explaining the issue. It is not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Following on from the revelations that nofollow will  no longer work for sculpting PageRank, there is a post on Matt Cutts&#8217; blog explaining the issue. It is not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://www.seothegame.com/google-and-no-follow-links-2052/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seothegame.com/?p=2052#comment-178</guid>
		<description>I guess the best thing to do would be to use all the available PageRank on every link now by taking out the no-follow links on those unimportant pages if they are not dangling node but leave them in for duplicate content links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the best thing to do would be to use all the available PageRank on every link now by taking out the no-follow links on those unimportant pages if they are not dangling node but leave them in for duplicate content links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lohith</title>
		<link>http://www.seothegame.com/google-and-no-follow-links-2052/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>lohith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seothegame.com/?p=2052#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Its frustrating to hear that Page rank is going to get evaporated in spite of all those no follow links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its frustrating to hear that Page rank is going to get evaporated in spite of all those no follow links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martinez</title>
		<link>http://www.seothegame.com/google-and-no-follow-links-2052/comment-page-1#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seothegame.com/?p=2052#comment-176</guid>
		<description>The problem with PageRank sculpting is that the SEO community has no way to track and measure PageRank, so it has never been possible to actually &quot;sculpt&quot; PageRank flow.

People who have attempted to make this work have been blindly shooting in the dark, and Googlers (including Matt Cutts) have been advising the SEO community pretty much for the past two years to NOT attempt to do this.

It has proven to be a colossal waste of SEO effort as to date no one has yet shown they can make it work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with PageRank sculpting is that the SEO community has no way to track and measure PageRank, so it has never been possible to actually &#8220;sculpt&#8221; PageRank flow.</p>
<p>People who have attempted to make this work have been blindly shooting in the dark, and Googlers (including Matt Cutts) have been advising the SEO community pretty much for the past two years to NOT attempt to do this.</p>
<p>It has proven to be a colossal waste of SEO effort as to date no one has yet shown they can make it work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
